<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exploring the HTML 5 Canvas Element</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2008/01/03/exploring-the-html-5-canvas-element/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2008/01/03/exploring-the-html-5-canvas-element/</link>
	<description>On the desktop, on the web, on the device ... On the Platform</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wilfried</title>
		<link>http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2008/01/03/exploring-the-html-5-canvas-element/#comment-45299</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilfried</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 22:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2008/01/03/exploring-the-html-5-canvas-element/#comment-45299</guid>
		<description>As we can read in mozilla developper center, using the  element isn't very difficult; you do need a basic understanding of HTML and JavaScript. The Canvas tutorial is complete and easy to test.
Thank you for this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we can read in mozilla developper center, using the  element isn&#8217;t very difficult; you do need a basic understanding of HTML and JavaScript. The Canvas tutorial is complete and easy to test.<br />
Thank you for this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abdul Qabiz</title>
		<link>http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2008/01/03/exploring-the-html-5-canvas-element/#comment-19052</link>
		<dc:creator>Abdul Qabiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2008/01/03/exploring-the-html-5-canvas-element/#comment-19052</guid>
		<description>On your last paragraph, It's so true... Most of components, we see today by JavaScript developers, are already done in ActionScript 1.0. I remember FUI Component sets... And lots of sites during that time for free components by community (Flash).

Don't know what has happened in last couple of years, we don't see that many components done by community. 

Is it because, Flex comes with lots of components and those suffice our requirements? Do we expect Adobe to do more? 

Is it because things have gone total developer way, so creative guys with decent actionscript knowledge are not willing to learn new flex/as3 stuff to replicate the same thing?

You said things in two lines, it means a lot (at least to me).

Thanks

-abdul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On your last paragraph, It&#8217;s so true&#8230; Most of components, we see today by JavaScript developers, are already done in ActionScript 1.0. I remember FUI Component sets&#8230; And lots of sites during that time for free components by community (Flash).</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t know what has happened in last couple of years, we don&#8217;t see that many components done by community. </p>
<p>Is it because, Flex comes with lots of components and those suffice our requirements? Do we expect Adobe to do more? </p>
<p>Is it because things have gone total developer way, so creative guys with decent actionscript knowledge are not willing to learn new flex/as3 stuff to replicate the same thing?</p>
<p>You said things in two lines, it means a lot (at least to me).</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>-abdul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
