<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visualizing Contacts in a Card Layout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2008/08/06/visualizing-contacts-in-a-card-layout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2008/08/06/visualizing-contacts-in-a-card-layout/</link>
	<description>On the desktop, on the web, on the device ... On the Platform</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  6 Jan 2009 22:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Hoyt</title>
		<link>http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2008/08/06/visualizing-contacts-in-a-card-layout/#comment-78163</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Hoyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2008/08/06/visualizing-contacts-in-a-card-layout/#comment-78163</guid>
		<description>Gerdt,

Not sure where you're going with this one. Flash Player is consistent across browser and operating system. Browsers themselves on the other hand, pick and choose how to implement the HTML specification (and JavaScript and CSS) however they see fit, which is never completely the same as any other implementation, in this case choosing different ways to render plug-in technology.

One might even suggest that in this case a specific browser has intentionally diverted from the specification with the direct intent of causing problems with a specific plug-in from a specific vendor. Suddenly opting out of supporting percentage values on the object tag, which has been supported by browsers at large for almost a decade?  Really?  Yeah, open web!  Yeah, standards!

I'd also point out that Flash Player 10 is beta software.

Regards,
Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gerdt,</p>
<p>Not sure where you&#8217;re going with this one. Flash Player is consistent across browser and operating system. Browsers themselves on the other hand, pick and choose how to implement the HTML specification (and JavaScript and CSS) however they see fit, which is never completely the same as any other implementation, in this case choosing different ways to render plug-in technology.</p>
<p>One might even suggest that in this case a specific browser has intentionally diverted from the specification with the direct intent of causing problems with a specific plug-in from a specific vendor. Suddenly opting out of supporting percentage values on the object tag, which has been supported by browsers at large for almost a decade?  Really?  Yeah, open web!  Yeah, standards!</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also point out that Flash Player 10 is beta software.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerdt Brouwer</title>
		<link>http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2008/08/06/visualizing-contacts-in-a-card-layout/#comment-77996</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerdt Brouwer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2008/08/06/visualizing-contacts-in-a-card-layout/#comment-77996</guid>
		<description>@Pat : Wouldn’t play in FF with v10 - switched over to IE with 9 and worked like a charm

Wasn't Flex supposed to be browser compatible??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pat : Wouldn’t play in FF with v10 - switched over to IE with 9 and worked like a charm</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t Flex supposed to be browser compatible??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Hoyt</title>
		<link>http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2008/08/06/visualizing-contacts-in-a-card-layout/#comment-75885</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Hoyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 03:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2008/08/06/visualizing-contacts-in-a-card-layout/#comment-75885</guid>
		<description>Just closing the loop here that this turned out to be a bug with Firefox.  Turns out that Firefox doesn't like having percentage based sizing on the object tag itself. Set sizing through CSS and you're good to go.

Thanks,
Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just closing the loop here that this turned out to be a bug with Firefox.  Turns out that Firefox doesn&#8217;t like having percentage based sizing on the object tag itself. Set sizing through CSS and you&#8217;re good to go.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Buchanan</title>
		<link>http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2008/08/06/visualizing-contacts-in-a-card-layout/#comment-74299</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Buchanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2008/08/06/visualizing-contacts-in-a-card-layout/#comment-74299</guid>
		<description>Dan:

Wouldn't play in FF with v10 - switched over to IE with 9 and worked like a charm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan:</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t play in FF with v10 - switched over to IE with 9 and worked like a charm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Vega</title>
		<link>http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2008/08/06/visualizing-contacts-in-a-card-layout/#comment-74218</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Vega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kevinhoyt.org/2008/08/06/visualizing-contacts-in-a-card-layout/#comment-74218</guid>
		<description>Kevin - I am having trouble viewing the demo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin - I am having trouble viewing the demo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
